From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:14:56 +0100 (BST)
Fwd Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 17:50:06 -0400
Subject: Re: New Face On Mars - Miller


>From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: New Face On Mars

>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:44:45 -0300
>>Subject: Re: New Face On Mars

>>>From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 05:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
>>>Subject: Re: New Face On Mars

>>>>From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>
>>>>To: UFO Updates <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>>Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 17:21:35 +0100 (BST)
>>>>Subject: New Face On Mars


<snip>

>>>>See http://tinyurl.co.uk/7ryw

<snip>

>>I see a glacier but no face. Am I missing something? And it
>>didn't enlarge for me.

>That's all I saw too Don: evidence of ancient waterflows. I
>think Stuart may have been having a little fun, pointing out
>the obvious to some of us, eh Stuart?


Don, Rick, Steve K.,

Well, I am truly amazed, really.

To me gentlemen there is a very obvious face there, with two
eyes, a nose, and even a lower forehead. I kid you not. I know
others have seen it too from personal e-mail. To me its
extremely clear which is why I drew it to the List's attention.

One of the sceptical points made about the original face on Mars
was that the human brain wants to see human faces and will make
them out to exist even when they patently aren't there.

You guys have disproved that.

Genuinely interesting.


Stuart Miller