From: Ray Dickenson <ray.dickenson.nul>
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:13:43 +0100
Fwd Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 07:23:14 -0400
Subject: Are We Missing Something?


Hello List,

Can't help thinking we're like the youngster who's learned about
'the birds and the bees' - but finds the analogy can't cover all
circumstances he might be interested in.

For instance - who's taken an electronics course starting with
analogy of electrons as charged 'particles' but had to change to
analogy of charged 'holes' when considering active solid-state
theory? That should tell us something about both analogies. They
don't fit the whole picture - so we're missing something.

Worse, the analogies used for light photons (actually all
radiation) - i.e. as discrete particles or waves, are each
clearly wrong when a case is tested - so we're missing something
there also.

And, stepping up to our best theories, Relativity and QM, we
find the mathematical analogies used for them also fail much of
the time, giving us those 'infinities' which have to be
discarded. But this time we can't swap analogies, for as yet we
haven't got other mathematics that might fit completely.

Relativity and QM won't even fit together when we try to stretch
them to cover the gaps. Relativity can't explain 'entanglement',
the recent strange behavior of light (google - "Nimtz Wang"), or
the distant too-old galaxies; while QM/QED, accurate as they
are after those 'infinities' are discarded, can't "see"
gravitational or nuclear forces at all.

And no-one has a cause for inertia or mass.

So we're missing many things.

Therefore, when we get reports hinting at manipulation of
physics as yet impossible for us, how can we claim to rule them
out?

If the craft/beings seem to obey 'our' physics - fine. But if
they don't - what then?

It's fairly apparent, from govt's clamp-downs, hoaxes and cover-
ups of bizarre cases, that they take these things seriously,
despite media flimflam. So why don't we all?

By clinging to incomplete human physics - we're maybe missing
something.


Cheers

Ray D