From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:34:44 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Fwd Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:29:31 -0500
Subject: Re: Serious 'Starchild' Problem - Balaskas


>From: Lloyd Pye <mailing_list.nul-uk.com>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:04:45 -0500
>Subject: Serious Starchild Problem

<snip>

>Thus, after six long years of frustrating struggle, we stand on
>the verge of making world-class history at some point during the
>next few months. Unfortunately, the closer we've drawn to
>scientifically proving our supposition about possible alien
>involvement, the less we are being helped to achieve that
>monumental goal. This is a baffling contradiction, one I simply
>don't understand. I work for all of you, in the stead of
>everyone whom I assume would do what I do if you had the
>opportunity. I would expect you all to help even more as we drew
>closer to the final goal. Yet exactly the opposite has taken
>place. The closer we get, the more help has dried up, to the
>point where we are near blowing away. I'm being painfully
>serious when I say that.

Greetings Lloyd!

There was much interest among members of the medical community
and research scientists at DNA labs here in Toronto with the
small bone fragment of the "Starchild" skull I presented to
them.

In our exchange of e-mail correspondence and telephone calls
early in 1999, we agreed that with the money you had already
raised, a thorough analysis of the skull would be performed in
Dr. Ronald Pearlman's DNA labs (a distinguished scientist in
this field) here at York University. Dr. Pearlman was prepared
to allocate a full-time researcher for at least half-a-year to
the analysis of the skull, the findings of which would be
suitable for publication in a top refereed scientific journal.
Nothing further happened and the skull (or a replica of it)
continues on its fund raising world tour.

I just want to let you know that the interest in the skull among
members of the medical/scientific community here in Toronto is
still very high and their offer to have it properly tested still
stands. Yes, you can continue to arrange to have many unrelated
and unnecessary tests done on the skull, and these tests will
find unusual or unexpected things (such specialized tests always
do, even with common objects of known origin) but collectively
they will not bring us any closer to answering the ultimate
question, is this skull fully human or not.


Nick Balaskas