From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 14:21:24 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 05:55:21 -0400
Subject: FYI The Mexico Case


[Delayed 'somewhere, out-there' arrived this a.m. --ebk]


Hi All,

One of the genuinely good things about how Jaime Maussan has
handled all of this is, after having been entrusted with this
most compelling piece of 'evidence' by the top military
officials in Mexico, Jaime has disseminated the material far and
wide _internationally_ and at warp speed. He is to be commended
for his democratic approach and the _superlative_ handling of
this whole case thus far. The man has been busting his hump over
this case and I'd like to be among the first to say a public and
well-earned, "Thank you" to Jaime.

Anything connected to this investigation is to be made as openly
available to all -as it can be made to be. It is in that spirit
that I post a copy of a communication between myself and Bruce
Maccabee. This way, _nobody_ is left out of the information loop
and no one can say that any information is being withheld by
anybody.

FYI UFO UpDates List:

Bruce Maccabee wrote:

>We MUST be able to
>correlate th radar detections with flir images, if possible.
>If they don't correlate, then so be it, but we won't know until we
>can establish the timing between radar targets and flir signals.

I responded:

Bruce, the crew already testified that the FLIR was pointed at
the _same_ target(s) they were getting on radar. I have read
this comment about the FLIR being pointed at the radar target in
a couple of places. It can also be heard in the audio portion of
the FLIR DVD.

Below is a copy of a note I received from Jaime with responses
to a couple of questions I had asked. In his response to me he
answers your question about radar data/recordings.

>Incidently, as the plane was flying eastward the objects
>may have been more than 15 miles away.

In the crew 'voice recording' that is part of the DVD, the crew
is calling out readings on the UFOs as they go. One voice will
say "I have the object at 12 miles distance" then another will
chime in with the speed of the object, "I make it moving at 335
MPH." etc.

I will be working on translating the sound track of the event
tomorrow. It should prove helpful to your analysis to know what
readings they were calling during the encounter.

I'm going to post a copy of this note to the List so every one
who is following along can stay on the same page as us
information-wise.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Note from Jaime:

John:


I have been reading in the list some of your questions.

1. Unfortunately the information in the Radar of the plane was
lost, because they never record that. They use the radar, just
to find the "blips", to chase them, and inform the military on
the ground if they land, and where did they land.

2. I ignore if there is information of radar in the ground. I
know they check twice with the military radar in city of Carmen,
Campeche, but this radar didn=B4t get the objects at any time in
the screen, it seems to me that they saw the objects in the
radar screen of the plane, but just in some angle. The only time
they saw the objects in the screen is when they chase the first
object and when the objects surrounded the plane, then they saw
two in the back and the left of the plane.

3. The Merlin C 26/A is not equipped with guns, it is just an
interception and information gathering airplane.

4. Starting this May the military is going to change the planes
to some more sophisticated planes.

5. I am here investigating in Campeche. I will let you know my
findings.

6. I don=B4t have anything against Scott Corrales-


Jaime

----------------------------------------------------------------

Hope all this helps, Bruce. I'll let you know about the DVD
audio translation as soon as I have it all down on paper. 


Best,

John