From: Christophe Meessen <meessen@mailclub.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 14:48:01 +0200
Fwd Date: Fri, 28 May 1999 23:12:49 -0400
Subject: Re: Ball Lightings Explained?


>From: Stig Agermose <stig.agermose@get2net.dk>
>Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 03:32:40 +0200 (MET DST)
>Subject: Ball Lightings Explained?
>To: updates@globalserve.net

>Source: New Scientist, May 22, 1999,

>http://www.newscientist.com:80/ns/19990522/newsstory11.html

Nice thoughts but the association between fire balls and tornado
is not so common. Regarding fire balls reports it is really a
minority.

My father has studied this extensively but didn't had time to
publish his findings yet.

There are a few reports of fire balls traversing windows. Since
glass is an electric insulator and not quit good to vehicule
chemical reactions, the only logical explanation would be that
electro-magnetic waves are involved and thus that the ball is
more like a sort of a stable plasma ball. I can't go into much
detail since this must still be published. As the tornado is a
stable concentration of energy in the form or air speed, fire
balls would be a very high concentration of electro-magnetic
energy but in a form that can sustain a significant time.

Is it needed to say that there are indeed relations with the
electro-magnetic propulsion proposed by my father.  In some way,
fire balls could be a natural instance of the principle used for
the EM propulsion by
UFOs.




Best regards,

Ch. Meessen